

You can't inspect a VPN's servers, but you can test its no-logs claim seven ways: read exactly what the policy says is stored, find the legal entity and its jurisdiction, look for an independent audit, check court cases and police requests, look for raids or seizures, review the app's permissions and privacy label, and run your own DNS and IP leak tests. A real no-logs policy names what isn't stored: browsing history, DNS queries, traffic content, connection timestamps and source IPs.
By Team Boycat
BuycatVPN
A no-logs VPN for iOS, Android, Mac, Windows and Linux.
Almost every VPN says "no logs". The phrase has no legal definition, and nobody outside the company can see its servers. So how do you know? You can't be certain, but you can gather evidence. Here are seven tests, from the five-minute check to the strongest proof.
VPN logs fall into three groups:
A "no logs" claim that only covers activity logs can still let a VPN link a session back to you through connection logs.
Open the VPN's privacy policy and search for: "log", "IP address", "timestamp", "retain", "aggregate", "third party", "law enforcement".
Good signs:
Red flags:
The terms of service name the company that runs the VPN. Search that name in the national company registry or OpenCorporates, and look for a parent company. The jurisdiction decides which courts can order data. The parent decides whose incentives you're trusting. (See: who owns VPN review sites.)
An audit means an outside security firm checked the servers, code or processes against the policy. Look for:
No audit doesn't prove logging, but a published, recent, full-scope audit is strong evidence.
The best proof is when the claim was tested by someone with a warrant.
Search "[VPN name] subpoena", "[VPN name] court", and "[VPN name] logs FBI".
When police seize a VPN's servers or visit its office, the outcome is public evidence. In 2023, Swedish police came to Mullvad's office with a search warrant. Mullvad says they left without customer data because none existed (Mullvad). Check whether the VPN publishes these events or a transparency report.
Leaks aren't logs, but they show whether your data is going where the VPN says.
| Evidence | Strength |
|---|---|
| Marketing says "no logs" | Weak |
| Policy lists exactly what isn't stored | Medium |
| Clear legal entity, no data-hungry parent | Medium |
| Recent full-scope audit, report published | Strong |
| Tested in court or a raid with nothing handed over | Strongest |
We'll hold ourselves to the same test. Buycat VPN's privacy policy states that we don't store browsing history, DNS queries or traffic content. The legal entity is Boycat with no parent conglomerate. We haven't published a third-party audit yet, and we'll link the report here when we do. Until then, judge us on the policy wording and run the leak tests yourself, inside our 30-day money-back window.
Read exactly what its privacy policy says is stored, check for a recent published audit, search for court cases or police requests involving it, and run DNS and IP leak tests.
It should mean the VPN doesn't store your browsing history, DNS queries, traffic content, or connection data that links a session to you. Check the policy for that list.
Technically, a VPN can see which servers you connect to. HTTPS hides page content, but the VPN can still see domains. A no-logs VPN commits to not recording them.
Yes. Private Internet Access couldn't provide user logs in FBI cases in 2016 and 2018. PureVPN, which also claimed no logs, did provide records in 2017.
It's strong evidence for the period and systems audited. Check the scope and date.
Related guides
BuycatVPN
A no-logs VPN built around your privacy.
AES-256 encryption on iOS, Android, Mac, Windows and Linux. 30-day money-back guarantee.
Get BuycatVPN